New branch for Prod/Dev Certs (was: Re: [aerogear-unified-push-server] Problem with ProdCerts branch iOS variant addition)
by Matthias Wessendorf
Hi
here is a different branch:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/tree/ProductionC...
it allows only one CERT/PASS per variant. So for "Production" and for
"Test" you basically create a separate variant.
Apple Requirements:
* iOS Distribution certificate (for your Apple developer ID/account)
* iOS Development certificate (for your Apple developer ID/account)
* Make sure both Dist/Dev SSL certs are enabled (on the actual APP ID).
Download and export BOTH, similar to:
http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/guides/aerogear-push-ios/app-id-ssl-cert...
For each "profile" (DEV and DIST) you need a separate Provisioning file, to
be downloaded from the Apple Provisioning Portal. Import them to Xcode and
your iOS device.
I have update the "register iOS Variant" dec:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/tree/ProductionC...
"Running the different profiles":
* update the iOS code to reflect the DEV variantID/secret, and run the
device with the MATCHING signing identity("Development" for your app-id) =>
This registers your DEV token, for the app/device, with our UP server
*send a message.
* stop the app
* Now, update the iOS code to reflect the DIST variantID/secret, and re-run
the device with the MATCHING signing identity("Distribution" for your
app-id) => This registers your DIST token, for the app/device, with our UP
server (Note the token here is DIFFERENT)
*send a message.
Here, we now have the test tokens in a separate variant, so only TEST
tokens are send to the Apple Sandbox Server, and only DIST tokens are send
to the Prod Server of Apple.
Before we were sending both token types (TEST and DIST) to the TEST or DIST
server (based on the "staging" value in the payload. This does not work
with APNs: No messages are delivered...
NExt: I am now working on a "filter" by variantID, so that (instead of
broadcast) you can just send "test messages" to the test variant ( this
"feature" was already discussed on a separate thread, for different reasons
but comes handy here too)
-Matthias
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Yavuz Selim YILMAZ <yavuzsel(a)buffalo.edu>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying out the ProdCerts branch on aerogear-unified-push-server to
> enable AeroGear powered push notifications on my production iOS application.
>
> When I am trying to add an iOS variant, I am getting:
>
> HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
> …
> The request sent by the client was syntactically incorrect ().
> …
>
> The curl command I am using is here:
>
> $curl -i -b cookies.txt -c cookies.txt -H "Accept: application/json" -H
> "Content-type: multipart/form-data" -F
> "developmentCertificate=(a)/Users/yavuz/Documents/Certificates.p12" -F
> "developmentPassphrase=pass" -X POST
> http://localhost:8080/ag-push/rest/applications/8055d0a9-ed30-463c-9ac3-b...
>
> As far as I could see, Bad Request is returned if developmentCertificate
> and/or developmentPassphrase is null (in my case,
> productionCertificate/Passphrase are already null). Therefore, in order to
> make sure my Certificates.p12 does not read null , I switched to master
> branch, and executed the following command successfully and add my variant:
>
> $curl -i -b cookies.txt -c cookies.txt -H "Accept: application/json" -H
> "Content-type: multipart/form-data" -F
> "certificate=(a)/Users/yavuz/Documents/Certificates.p12" -F "passphrase=pass"
> -X POST
> http://localhost:8080/ag-push/rest/applications/688d0fe1-4cc2-4606-ab10-0...
>
> Any ideas why I might be getting this error, or any suggestions/directions
> are most appreciated.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> ---
> Yavuz Selim Yilmaz
> SUNY at Buffalo
> Computer Science and Engineering
> PhD Candidate
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
10 years, 11 months
Push Admin UI - Updating
by Lucas Holmquist
here's a scenario.
A user creates an "Application" then adds a new "iOS Variant" to it.
they decide they need to rename this Variant since they didn't name it very well.
There is currently no way of renaming/ updating the description of this variant without re-sending the Certificate/pass phrase. this would be the same for Android and Simple Push, just substitute google key and channels
Also, once we have a variant created, we have a variant ID, we should be able to use that ID( plus type? ) to do updates instead of having to pass the applicaitonID and variantID( same would go for a delete i guess ).
Not really sure the best way to handle this.
Should a user be able to update a certificate/key/channel once it has been created. How would this affect any installations it might have?
thoughts?
-Luke
10 years, 11 months
Travis on branches
by Kris Borchers
I would like to propose we only run Travis on changes to master (push, PR, etc). The problem I am having is pushing broken code to branches for review, testing, etc. is causing Travis to mark the repo as broken in the status image which is not true. Anyone have any other thoughts on this or feel that Travis breaking on branches is at all useful?
10 years, 11 months
AeroGear Controller 1.0.2 released
by Bruno Oliveira
Good morning, AeroGear Controller was released.
- Changelog
* Preparing to release AeroGear Controller 1.0.2
* Merge branch 'charset'
* Added JUnit test to verify ParameterExtractor.extractArguments
handles content-types with charset definitions properly
* Made ParameterExtractor ignore charset information when looking for
a Consumer
Note: Now we just have to wait for the syncing between Nexus and Maven
Central.
--
abstractj
10 years, 11 months
