Ok, just a quick end-of-week sum up :
First good news : We managed to have both ios, android and web scenarios working, meaning being able to send a push message from an "independent" JEE app to the different devices  using unified-push-server and simple-push-server \o/

Backend "prodoctor" : I had a lot of feedback and it should  be pretty "stable" enough for the demo. Thanks Corinne for having detailed the flow of the app ( https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstart-backend#general-flow )

Clients :

- ios  : Corinne is doing great progress, will be awesome , I'm sure

- android : Daniel has been doing a lot of efforts as well, the app is almost done

- web : well, there is nothing yet in the official repo but on https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstart-backend/tree/client and by browsing to /prodoctor/client you will have a first preview of the work. Basically, the client connects to the simple push server, when a lead is pushed, the clients will automatically fire a refresh of the leads list.

We still have to discuss some points like : 
- being sure how the device registration is going (passing the alias only the first time etc ...)
- use case polishing
- Documentation

As usual, all the repos are on github, so if you have the killing fix/feature , just push your PR ! 

Seb


 




On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
+1


On 21 June 2013 17:08, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
http://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstart-backend/commit/5be6e725f

I've also updated the broadcast message to {"alert" : "Lead <name> has been accepted"}



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
Good point Corinne ! Let me change that ! 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
I would like {"alert" : "Lead <name> available"}

as the admin can create a lead and not push it. The lead can get pushed later (after creation)
Beside if the SA has dismissed the lead, admin can decide to push it again to SA.


On 21 June 2013 15:34, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
it's only visible on Android and iOS :-)

I'd vote for {"alert" : "A new lead has been created"} 

(something like that, in a more proper English :))


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
To all the Clients devs :
I need to know what you want to receive in the alert field of the push message : All is possible , just scream your wishes !



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
Yep, it's a must have ! Don't worry , I think I will update the repo with that today



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 Kris. Very true.


On 21 June 2013 14:18, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:
I think this all sounds good except see #7

On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:11 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:

So to sum up:

1. Your are a Sale Agent (SA) and you log yourself

2. First screen displayed a list of all unassigned leads retrieved server side (Rest service by default send only unassigned leads)


3. An admin pushes a new lead to a chosen list of SA (including you)

4. You receive the push notification, alert is displayed

5. Your device refresh the list of unassigned leads (server side call). Potentially retrieving also unassigned leads not directly pushed to you. Nice to have feature: The one pushed to you should be highlighted.

6. You accept the lead. The lead is removed from unassigned list and go in Second tab: your accepted list which is stored locally on you device.

7. Nice to have: On acceptation of your lead, you send an update to server. Server side broadcast to all SA (except yourself) to refresh unassigned leads list.


I don't think this is a nice to have but a necessity. Otherwise you could have multiple users trying to assign the same lead.

+1 

it also shows a nice integration between all the layers: mobile, backend/business server app, and the PushServer(s)

 


ok for all?

Corinne



On 21 June 2013 09:41, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
I think I am going to change the GET /leads service to retrieve only unassigned leads rather than a new service 


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
if we go go for storing the lead locally in "in progress tab" are we going to display the leads from local storage then and not the one not assigned. is that how you see it?

Yes, and that could be a good start for in the future when we will expand the demo with offline and sync (NOT NOW :) )
 


On 21 June 2013 09:07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
I like it but for now there is no service to retrieve leads by SaleAgents, so we have 2 options :

- Implement the service (Doh!)
- Store the accepted leads on the device

+1 on device storing (using the AG-DataStore API)
 

Seb



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,

So I see it with 2 tabs:
one "in progress leads" with all the leads accepted by the agent logged (default screen)
another with "new leads" with all pushed leads unassigned

a bubble notification appear on "new leads" tab icon once a lead has been pushed by the admin

the sale agent can then accept this lead which then move to the "in progress tab"

If another agent accept the lead, the lead should disappear from the "new leads"

are you ok with the UI workflow? 


On 20 June 2013 23:33, Sébastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
Show all leads that have no sale agent id set 

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le Jun 20, 2013 à 22:21, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych@gmail.com> a écrit :

Sebi,

When a sale agent logs in he should see a list of leads with criteria like all lead belonging to him or leads made in his area or just all leads?
as the admin user does selective push (with geolocation criteria or other) i wonder if it makes sense to display all leads at initial login.

On the other hand if the sale agent got only its lead there is no point to broadcast to others when a lead is accepted.

wdyt?


On 16 June 2013 11:56, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:33:12AM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> JIRA => https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1261

Please assign those to me next time - spent a good time trying to find
it :P

Oh, sorry :) I thought I did that. Added (and reopened) for one more repo request:
  • aerogear-push-quickstart-web


Cheers!
Matthias

 

--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev