Based on that 'generic' spec ([1]), something like this would be the
_concrete_ iOS API:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Hello!
I have update the PR as well.
I added a more generic/abstract spec, that does not talk about
specific implementations details of a certain SDK.
-Matthias
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just updated the PR with a new "usage" page based on the
comparison
> gist we had.
> I
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/27
>>
>> I am sure we will have lots of discussion about this too, but it is a
>> distillation of all our ideas that worked out.
>>
>> I contributed it to the aerogear repo so feel free to poke it.
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf