[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3741) Developer Studio should install under developer-studio instead of DeveloperStudio
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Alexey Kazakov commented on JBDS-3741:
--------------------------------------
We should use what is common practice on Windows. And yes we should be consistent on folder names we create in by our installer.
> Developer Studio should install under developer-studio instead of DeveloperStudio
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3741
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3741
> Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: installer
> Reporter: Hardy Ferentschik
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: havoc
> Attachments: directories.png
>
>
> Currently Developer studio is installed under the folder {{DeveloperStudio}} within the installation directory. All other programs use lower case directory names for their install directory (eg vagrant, cygwun, jdk8, etc). For consistency it should be developerstudio or developer-studio. See screenshot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22036) batch property is incorrectly renamed in job.xml when refactoring
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Alexey Kazakov updated JBIDE-22036:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.4.x
> batch property is incorrectly renamed in job.xml when refactoring
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22036
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22036
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: batch
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.CR1
> Reporter: Rastislav Wagner
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
>
> my job.xml:
> {code}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <job id="myJob" xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/jobXML_1_0.xsd"
> version="1.0">
> <step id="step1" >
> <batchlet ref="myBatchlet">
> <properties>
> <property name="namedProperty" value="A"/>
> </properties>
> </batchlet>
> </step>
> </job>
> {code}
> my batchlet:
> {code}
> package batch;
> import javax.batch.api.AbstractBatchlet;
> import javax.batch.api.BatchProperty;
> import javax.inject.Inject;
> import javax.inject.Named;
> @Named
> public class MyBatchlet extends AbstractBatchlet {
>
> @Inject
> @BatchProperty(name = "namedProperty") String myProp;
> public MyBatchlet() {
> // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
> }
> @Override
> public String process() throws Exception {
> // TODO Auto-generated method stub
> return null;
> }
> }
> {code}
> When I rename myProp in MyBatchelet to let's say myProp1 the value in job.xml will get changed to myProp1. This will result in warning because Im using @BatchProperty(name ="namedProperty")
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22036) batch property is incorrectly renamed in job.xml when refactoring
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Alexey Kazakov reassigned JBIDE-22036:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: Viacheslav Kabanovich
> batch property is incorrectly renamed in job.xml when refactoring
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22036
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22036
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: batch
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.CR1
> Reporter: Rastislav Wagner
> Assignee: Viacheslav Kabanovich
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
>
> my job.xml:
> {code}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <job id="myJob" xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/jobXML_1_0.xsd"
> version="1.0">
> <step id="step1" >
> <batchlet ref="myBatchlet">
> <properties>
> <property name="namedProperty" value="A"/>
> </properties>
> </batchlet>
> </step>
> </job>
> {code}
> my batchlet:
> {code}
> package batch;
> import javax.batch.api.AbstractBatchlet;
> import javax.batch.api.BatchProperty;
> import javax.inject.Inject;
> import javax.inject.Named;
> @Named
> public class MyBatchlet extends AbstractBatchlet {
>
> @Inject
> @BatchProperty(name = "namedProperty") String myProp;
> public MyBatchlet() {
> // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
> }
> @Override
> public String process() throws Exception {
> // TODO Auto-generated method stub
> return null;
> }
> }
> {code}
> When I rename myProp in MyBatchelet to let's say myProp1 the value in job.xml will get changed to myProp1. This will result in warning because Im using @BatchProperty(name ="namedProperty")
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3710) use brackets logo for Developer Platform installer
by Joshua Wilson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Joshua Wilson commented on JBDS-3710:
-------------------------------------
[~pmuir] in the header of the Installer. I would be on every page. Currently it is Shadowman.
> use brackets logo for Developer Platform installer
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3710
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3710
> Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: installer
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.CR1
> Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
> Assignee: Joshua Wilson
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: havoc
> Fix For: 9.1.0.GA
>
> Attachments: RedHatDeveloperStudio_Logo_Installer.ico
>
>
> Based on feedback from [~pmuir], [~tmancini] and [~crobson] we'll go for using the brackets logo for the big Developer Platform installers (56M stub and 1.6G bundled).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3710) use brackets logo for Developer Platform installer
by Pete Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Pete Muir commented on JBDS-3710:
---------------------------------
[~maxandersen] No, the installer is part of devstudio - that is in the product definition deck.
[~jowilson] in what context do you want to use the Brackets logo?
> use brackets logo for Developer Platform installer
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3710
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3710
> Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: installer
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.CR1
> Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
> Assignee: Joshua Wilson
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: havoc
> Fix For: 9.1.0.GA
>
> Attachments: RedHatDeveloperStudio_Logo_Installer.ico
>
>
> Based on feedback from [~pmuir], [~tmancini] and [~crobson] we'll go for using the brackets logo for the big Developer Platform installers (56M stub and 1.6G bundled).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22004) Runtime detection unable to detect CDK
by Rob Stryker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-22004:
-------------------------------------
Hi Hardy:
The primary purpose of this file is to designate what is or is not a cdk. It has other secondary purposes which help us in creating our openshift and docker connections, but this is primary.
Without this marker file, all we'd have is Vagrantfile. When a user wants to 'scan' a folder recursively to locate any cdk instances, we'd probably end up claiming every folder with a VagrantFile in it is a cdk, because there's no real way to parse the VagrantFile to determine if it's actually referencing the CDK or not.
Instead, we ask the installer or other distributions to include a .cdk file so that we can separate it from other vagrant instances.
Does this need to be in a raw cdk distribution? Only if we want the tools to autodetect it when a user scans a folder.
> Runtime detection unable to detect CDK
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22004
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22004
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: runtime-detection, upstream
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.CR1
> Reporter: Radim Hopp
> Assignee: Hardy Ferentschik
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
>
> Due to absency of ".cdk" file in official distribution of CDK (version 2.0.0.Beta5), runtime detection is unable to detect it.
> Installator probably adds that file during install, but shouldn't we support detection of "by-hand" downloaded CDK?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22035) Stopping of J2EE module does not work
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Alexey Kazakov updated JBIDE-22035:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.4.0.Alpha1
> Stopping of J2EE module does not work
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22035
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22035
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.CR1
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Labels: openshift_v3, server_adapter
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Stopping of J2EE Web module lying under an OpenShift 3 Server Adapter does nothing. After discussion with Rob in JBIDE-21989, stop of J2EE module should create an .undeploy marker and rsync it, but that's not happening. Only output from rsync when stopping J2EE module is following
> {code}sent 46 bytes received 1,333 bytes 2,758.00 bytes/sec
> total size is 8,523,390 speedup is 6,180.85
> sending incremental file list
> ROOT.war.isdeploying
> sent 1,428 bytes received 149 bytes 3,154.00 bytes/sec
> total size is 8,523,390 speedup is 5,404.81{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22035) Stopping of J2EE module does not work
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Alexey Kazakov reassigned JBIDE-22035:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: Rob Stryker
> Stopping of J2EE module does not work
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22035
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22035
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.CR1
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
> Labels: openshift_v3, server_adapter
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Stopping of J2EE Web module lying under an OpenShift 3 Server Adapter does nothing. After discussion with Rob in JBIDE-21989, stop of J2EE module should create an .undeploy marker and rsync it, but that's not happening. Only output from rsync when stopping J2EE module is following
> {code}sent 46 bytes received 1,333 bytes 2,758.00 bytes/sec
> total size is 8,523,390 speedup is 6,180.85
> sending incremental file list
> ROOT.war.isdeploying
> sent 1,428 bytes received 149 bytes 3,154.00 bytes/sec
> total size is 8,523,390 speedup is 5,404.81{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3738) Getting Started / Readme for new users after Dev Platform install is complete
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Alexey Kazakov commented on JBDS-3738:
--------------------------------------
[~mhusnain] you can talk with [~fbricon] about content of this doc.
> Getting Started / Readme for new users after Dev Platform install is complete
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3738
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3738
> Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: documentation, installer
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.CR1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Labels: Havoc
> Fix For: 9.1.0.GA
>
>
> Per discussion today, we need some sort of README / Getting Started Guide for new CDK users.
> This could be a link from the last page of the Dev Platform installer to a remote HTML page, but we could also include a copy of that HTML page in the c:\devplatform folder so people can refer to it offline.
> Need to decide where to locate the page online. If the doc can be available before April 12, it could potentially be included in the output of the installer for offline use too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 2 months