[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-23275) Rename doesn't change fully qualified name in job.xml file
by Ondrej Dockal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Ondrej Dockal updated JBIDE-23275:
----------------------------------
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Rename doesn't change fully qualified name in job.xml file
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-23275
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23275
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: batch
> Affects Versions: 4.4.2.AM1
> Environment: Fedora 24
> Reporter: Lukáš Valach
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
> Attachments: BatchRenameManualTest.zip
>
>
> Refactoring doesn't modify job.xml when I renaming class which is referred in job.xml using the fully qualified name.
> For example, when I have batchlet class
> {code:java}
> package test;
> public class BatchletWithProperty extends AbstractBatchlet {
> ...
> }
> {code}
> ...and job.xml
> {code:xml}
> <job ...>
> <step id="step1">
> <batchlet ref="test.BatchletWithProperty"> <!-- linked using the fully qualified name -->
> ...
> </batchlet>
> </step>
> ...
> </job>
> {code}
> ...then, when I try to rename test.BatchletWithProperty the refactoring doesn't change fully qualified name in job.xml.
> Renaming works properly when I refer to class using name coming from @Named annotation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-23275) Rename doesn't change fully qualified name in job.xml file
by Ondrej Dockal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Ondrej Dockal updated JBIDE-23275:
----------------------------------
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
> Rename doesn't change fully qualified name in job.xml file
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-23275
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23275
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: batch
> Affects Versions: 4.4.2.AM1
> Environment: Fedora 24
> Reporter: Lukáš Valach
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
> Attachments: BatchRenameManualTest.zip
>
>
> Refactoring doesn't modify job.xml when I renaming class which is referred in job.xml using the fully qualified name.
> For example, when I have batchlet class
> {code:java}
> package test;
> public class BatchletWithProperty extends AbstractBatchlet {
> ...
> }
> {code}
> ...and job.xml
> {code:xml}
> <job ...>
> <step id="step1">
> <batchlet ref="test.BatchletWithProperty"> <!-- linked using the fully qualified name -->
> ...
> </batchlet>
> </step>
> ...
> </job>
> {code}
> ...then, when I try to rename test.BatchletWithProperty the refactoring doesn't change fully qualified name in job.xml.
> Renaming works properly when I refer to class using name coming from @Named annotation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-23278) Validation of class reference in job.xml produces false-positive warning
by Lukáš Valach (JIRA)
Lukáš Valach created JBIDE-23278:
------------------------------------
Summary: Validation of class reference in job.xml produces false-positive warning
Key: JBIDE-23278
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23278
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: batch
Affects Versions: 4.4.2.AM1
Environment: Fedora 24
Reporter: Lukáš Valach
Attachments: BatchRenameManualTest.zip, Rename-Warning.png
When I refer to some class using fully qualified name and that class is annotated by @Named or is mentioned in bean.xml, then the eclipse shows warning "Item ... not found." although class exists and code is valid (test passes).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-4059) RPM errors: Installing rh-eclipse46-devstudio.10.1 into rh-eclipse46 beta.
by Václav Kadlčík (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Václav Kadlčík commented on JBDS-4059:
--------------------------------------
Thanks for working on the issue.
I checked rh-eclipse46-devstudio-10.2-0.20160930.0121.el7.x86_64.rpm; all fine except libnotify.so.1 (needed for .../org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_64_1.9.2.19pre/xulrunner/components/libmozgnome.so). As I wrote a week ago, libnotify.so.1 cannot be resolved in RHEL 7. I believe that Eclipse wouldn't load that libmozgnome.so.
I see two possibilities:
1. Maybe libmozgnome.so is dead code and I'd be happy to add the reference to libnotify.so.1 as a known false positive (though cutting the dead code out would be better).
2. Maybe it's not dead; then libmozgnome.so would need to be fixed somehow - supplemented with libnotify.so.1 or rebuilt against libnotify.so.4 etc.
Please look into this specific problem.
I'd like to reopen this issue but I don't see how, maybe I'm missing permissions?
> RPM errors: Installing rh-eclipse46-devstudio.10.1 into rh-eclipse46 beta.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-4059
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4059
> Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Reporter: Pavol Srna
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 10.2.0.AM2
>
>
> [~vkadlcik] has run some rpm sanity tests. The findings can be seen here: http://nest.test.redhat.com/mnt/qa/scratch/bkr-hv03-guest19/2016:24366/tp...
> [~nickboldt] can you please investigate? Thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-4065) DevStudio 1.1 Installer unfriendly when 1.0 present
by Martin Malina (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Martin Malina commented on JBDS-4065:
-------------------------------------
Good point, Alexey. I think this is a good question for Rob.
[~rob.stryker], what's gonna happen if your workspace has a cdk server adapter automatically created during devsuite install and then you create a new devsuite installation and start the new devstudio with the old workspace? Will a second cdk adapter appear? My guess would be that since the Vagrantfile path is most likely the same, the new addition will be ignored and only the old cdk adapter will be present. Am I correct?
> DevStudio 1.1 Installer unfriendly when 1.0 present
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-4065
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4065
> Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cdk, platform-installer
> Affects Versions: 10.1.0.GA
> Environment: Windows 10, DevSuite Installer 1.0 had been run
> Reporter: Rick Wagner
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
>
> When running the DevSuite 1.1 installer, DevStudio is not connected to the installed CDK.
> Observations:
> - All components removed before installation, does not help. (VirtualBox and Vagrant using Add/Remove programs, everything else directory-deleted, Environment variables cleaned).
> - DevStudio says it can't start the Container Development Environment server. ('Failed to find Vagrant!' reads the error). If I open Launch Configuration, it lists the Main as "C:\HashiCorp\Vagrant\bin\vagrant.exe", which is not in the installation directory.
> - It was noted that DevStudio marked itself 'completed' before Vagrant was installed. How does DevStudio know where Vagrant is?
> - It's noted that DevStudio 'remembers' user settings (i.e. CDK registration user/password) from previous attempts. Where is this information kept? I must've missed something in cleanup.
> - Tried full suite installation, then deleting DevStudio, then re-installing. (Hoping DevStudio would then find Vagrant in the right location, because it followed Vagrant's installation.) Result: No Container Development Environment server is present in 'server' view.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-4074) requirements.json definition should contain download info for all supported platforms
by Denis Golovin (JIRA)
Denis Golovin created JBDS-4074:
-----------------------------------
Summary: requirements.json definition should contain download info for all supported platforms
Key: JBDS-4074
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4074
Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: platform-installer
Affects Versions: 10.2.0.AM1
Environment: Windows, Mac OS X
Reporter: Denis Golovin
Currently requirements.json contains only windows specific download info, its format should let define info for all supported platforms. For example vagrant info should have links do download installers for windows and Mac OS X.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
7 years, 8 months