January 2008 - jbossws-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?

by burrsutter

I agree. Such innovation & advancement deserves more than a minor release number! :-) Question: if an end-user wishes to use the CXF flavor of JBossWS, is it 100% compatible with my current JAX-RPC & JAX-WS web services running in their current AS? No changes required, just a drop in replacement? "2.1.1" suggests that is the case. And fantastic stuff from a great community driven team! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119138#4119138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119138

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Mark sais: anonymous wrote : | Nice work. I would call it 3.0 to be honest: it's a significant difference over the previous release IMO. | | Mark. | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119086#4119086 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119086

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

Here are my 2 cents: "thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : ... and if only native changes we would have redundant releases? | | * jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.4 | * jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0 | * jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0 Not sure if this might be convenient in practice, however what about doing the following way if we choose the verbose option? - native only changes * jbossws-2.1.0-native-2.0.4 * jbossws-2.1.0-metro-1.0.0 * jbossws-2.1.0-cxf-1.0.0 i.e. we release jbossws-2.1.0-native-2.0.4 only - framework/spi/common only changes * jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.3 * jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0 * jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0 i.e. we release all, without changing the stack release number - framework/spi/common changes + native changes * jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.4 * jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0 * jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0 i.e. we release all, also changing the native stack release number View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119074#4119074 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119074

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: developer conference topics

by Thomas Diesler

I would like to address the procedure of how the EAP and other platforms consume our respective projects. Currently we have the situation where we do extensive QA against our supported platforms. http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/ Later the EAP team strips the build apart and even modifies source artifacts only to see that they have test failures that they come back to us with. This has become a resource killer that we cannot ignore any longer. I'd personally like to have the view that we work on community projects that must be consumed by a platform "as is". If the platform folks modify bits, its their business and not supported by us. cheers -thomas Mark Little wrote: > So far I have the following as topics we'd like to have discussions > around at the dev conference (remember that we're looking for topics > that cut across more than just SOA-P): > > Identity is one that we could make some progress with. Where are we with > regards to identity management and ACLs? Many projects have a need for > this within the SOA-P and outside. I know that Anil is working on > something with Scott and that Portal's efforts may be the basis of this. > I also know that there has been some discussion on the forums around > whether or not the current architecture proposed is flexible enough for > everyone's needs. > > I think we should definitely have a session around the Microcontainer > and why people shouldn't be developing their own IoC any more. > > SOA Platform tooling: what do we need and how do we go about it (e.g., > what implementation technology choices should we be looking to support)? > > Performance lab: what are the needs of the individual projects and how > can we seed the lab? This cuts across more than just SOA-P of course. > > Are there other things you would like to propose? Given that the dev > conference is now only a day, and that there will be topics from other > groups, we should probably agree on about 5 important topics rather than > try to fill the day with niche discussions. > > Mark. > > ---- > Mark Little > mlittle(a)redhat.com > > JBoss, a Division of Red Hat > Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod > Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdon. > Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 > Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons > (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland). > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?

by Thomas Diesler

Hi Mark/Sacha, I would like to release jbossws-2.1 (maybe called jbossws-3.0) for JBossWorld and announce that we have pluggable stacks available for public consumption. Could you please comment on http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119056#4119056 if you care. cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

... and if only native changes we would have redundant releases? * jbossws-2.1.1-native-2.0.4 * jbossws-2.1.1-metro-1.0.0 * jbossws-2.1.1-cxf-1.0.0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119066#4119066 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119066

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in what version?

by dimitris＠jboss.org

I like the verbose approach, i.e. * jbossws-2.1.0-native-2.0.3 * jbossws-2.1.0-metro-1.0.0 * jbossws-2.1.0-cxf-1.0.0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119062#4119062 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119062

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - JBossWS brings Metro/CXF but in waht version?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, we are about to release jbossws-2.0.3.GA on 1-Feb-2008. So far we communicated that jbossws-2.1 will come with plugablility for Metro and CXF and the release criteria was that all three stacks pass a common jax-ws testsuite that is defined in our framework module. | The JBossWS project is organised like this | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~+ | Target Container: | AS-5.0 | | AS-4.2 | | AS-4.0 | | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | Container Integration: | jbossws-jboss50 | | jbossws-jboss42 | | jbossws-jboss40 | | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | WS Framework: | jbossws-spi, jbossws-framework, jbossws-common | | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | WS Stack Integration: | jbossws-native | | jbossws-metro | | jbossws-cxf | | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | WS Stack: | jbossws-core | | Sun Metro | | Apache CXF | | | | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+ | | | WS-* Extensions: +~+ +~+ +~+ +~+ +~+ +~+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +~+ +~+ +~+ +~+ +~+ +~+ +~~~~+ | JAXWS Testsuite | For both stacks Metro and CXF the testsuite passes except a few minor issues that we currently cannot make progress because of some cooperation details with Sun/Apache that would need to be resolved. In short, I would like to release jbossws-2.1 (maybe called jbossws-3.0) for JBossWorld and anounce that we have pluggable stacks available for public consumtion. What I am not sure about however is the versioning scheme of our upcomming releases. The version number appears in * Download file (i.e. jbossws-native-2.0.2.GA) * JIRA version (i.e. roadmap, changelog) * SVN tag * Binary repository All of the above follow the same version scheme. Given that all stacks have an independent live cycle and are essentially standalone projects (as reflected in our SVN structure) I find it difficult to come up with an adequate versioning scheme | * jbossws-native-2.1.0 | * jbossws-metro-2.1.0 | * jbossws-cxf-2.1.0 | | | | | poses the question where is jbossws-metro-1.0.0. Also eight weeks later we might not have changes in all three stacks - do we redundantly release all three stacks or only the stacks that have actually changed? | | | | | | | * jbossws-native-2.0.3 | | | * jbossws-metro-1.0.0 | | | * jbossws-cxf-1.0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | Misses the point that a new area (pluggable stacks) has begun and it would make little sense to talk about jbossws-2.1 if there is no download and no jira roadmap for it. | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jbossws-2.1.0-native-2.0.3 | | | | | * jbossws-2.1.0-metro-1.0.0 | | | | | * jbossws-2.1.0-cxf-1.0.0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Is another possibility that would transport the idea of a fast moving jbossws framework project (8 week release cycle) with independent release cycles for the containing stacks. | | | | | | | | | | | | Generally, I would like to stick to the jbossws brand with a single version, which would get lost if we talk about three independent projects. | | | | | | | | | | | | I am interested to hear your feedback | | | | | | | | | | | | cheers | | | | | | | | | | | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4119056#4119056 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4119056

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: SOA-P tyre kicking

by Thomas Diesler

Is there a wiki page that documents SVN access and build instructions? cheers -thomas trevor kirby wrote: > Mark Little wrote: >> Please ask your team members to download and kick the tyres on the SOA >> Platform release. Trevor or Mike (in cc) can point you at the latest >> release. I can't over emphasize how important this is for us and the >> company: your input is greatly appreciated. >> > The release and docs can be found at > http://porkchop.redhat.com/devel/candidates/SOAP4.2.0/beta1/ > > http://porkchop.redhat.com/devel/candidates/SOAP4.2.0/beta1/standalone-so... > > is the version based on the standalone ESB server > > http://porkchop.redhat.com/devel/candidates/SOAP4.2.0/beta1/soa-4.2.0.bet... > > is the version embedded in EAP > > Trev > >> Mark. >> >> ---- >> >> Mark Little >> mlittle(a)redhat.com <mailto:mlittle@redhat.com> >> >> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat >> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod >> Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in UK >> and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael >> Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan >> Lane (Ireland) >> >> >> >> > > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Why Hudson build fail for Native-Core-AS-5.0.0

by Richard Opalka

I reviewed all yesterday changes and discovered that the following SVN commit http://fisheye.jboss.com/browse/JBossAS/trunk/server/src/etc/conf/default... breaks our test suite. -- B.Sc. Richard Opalka Senior Software Engineer JBoss, a division of Red Hat Mobile: +420 731 186 942 Mail: ropalka(a)redhat.com

16 years, 4 months

3
9
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-dev January 2008