[aerogear-dev] [AeroGear.js] Persistence API - draft 0.1

Bruno Oliveira bruno at abstractj.org
Thu Aug 16 09:52:37 EDT 2012


+1 for 'remove' instead of 'del' 

Something like this for documentation might be useful http://docs.emberjs.com/

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile



On Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com (mailto:kris at redhat.com)> wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback! See responses inline.
> > 
> > On Aug 16, 2012, at 4:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org (mailto:matzew at apache.org)> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > looking at [1] and also reading the client JS code from the TODO app
> > (->app.js), I am wondering if there is a newer version of the draft?
> > 
> > 
> > This is more up to date but also needs some updating.
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/blob/master/src/pipeline/README.md
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> Ah... good to have some well hidden documents :-P
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Also, inside of the rest adapter of aerogear.js the 'delete' function
> > is called 'del' ([2]), not sure if that's a good idea..
> > 
> > 
> > I was using delete but that is a reserved word in JavaScript so linters hate
> > it. I decided to change to del but we can change it to remove or something
> > else. I am open to suggestions.
> > 
> 
> 
> I know :-) but 'del' is a bit _awful_, IMO. why not remove, for now?
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > While reading the app.js file, I also noticed that some of the 'setup'
> > syntax needs to be documented (e.g. the draft is missing details on
> > settings,url etc of the cfg object):
> > var todo = aerogear.pipeline([
> > {
> > name: "tasks",
> > settings: {
> > url: "/todo-server/task"
> > }
> > },
> > ...
> > 
> > Also - perhaps for now it is OK, but I think it (still) reads a bit
> > too much jQuery/ajax like?!
> > projectGet = Projects.read({
> > ajax: {
> > success: function( data, textStatus, jqXHR ) {
> > $( "#project-loader" ).hide();
> > updateProjectList( data );
> > }
> > }
> > });
> > (I think we had this topic already in the past, not too strong
> > feelings about this... but just wanted to mention this)
> > 
> > 
> > The reason there isn't documentation and that it looks like jQuery.ajax is
> > because it is. :) The ajax settings are basically a straight passthrough to
> > jQuery ajax so that any of those settings can be overridden. We can discuss
> > changing this but I figured why hide the fact that we're using jQuery.ajax
> > or add another layer of complexity over the already large list of settings
> > that can be changed on jQuery.ajax
> > 
> 
> 
> fair enough, but I think with different _transport_ (read websocket or
> OData), we will see room for improvement.
> But not that of a big deal, right now;
> 
> 
> > 
> > Oh, one last question, is there a decent/easy way to generate API docs
> > out of the JavaScript API?
> > 
> > 
> > I have not found one that I like. Most solutions require adding a bunch of
> > garbage to the source which I am not a fan of because it makes the source
> > itself harder to read. That being said, I am also not a fan of maintaining
> > that documentation by hand so hoping I can find some middle ground. Again,
> > open to suggestions.
> > 
> 
> 
> Yeah, but we need for all the clients (e.g. Android, iOS and JS) some
> way to generate api docs.
> 
> In previous jobs I've used this:
> http://code.google.com/p/jsdoc-toolkit/
> 
> we can evaluate a certain tool at a later point, just wanted to ensure
> we actually do something there :-)
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > [1] https://gist.github.com/3084134
> > [2]
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/blob/master/src/pipeline/adapters/rest.js#L74
> > 
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > 
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20120816/436e8a5e/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list