[aerogear-dev] Prepping for Data Sync in AeroGear.js

Sébastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Wed Oct 10 12:53:20 EDT 2012


I think we should also take a look at the "slowly changing dimension " theories : 
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slowly_changing_dimension#
In particularly type VI

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le Oct 10, 2012 à 18:38, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> a écrit :

> 
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Sébastien Blanc wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> Really interesting. I'm also thinking a lot about the data synch process and I'm glad to see that your ideas are pretty much the same as me.
>> But great challenges to come like dealing multiple edits of the same record by different clients :)
> One strategy that I've seen in the wild is having smaller records, (a contact entity could potentially have a timestamp for each field, to aid during the merge)
> 
> I know it's pretty aggressive and wasteful - just food for thought
> 
>> About triggering the synch process we could start a POC with the "online" event on the client side, that could spawn a webwork script taking care of the synch process. 
>> On the server side, we have to manage a sort of queue maintaining the state of the "dirty" records on which the clients can subscribe (and being noticed by push events , web sockets etc ...) , very exciting stuff to come.
>> 
>> Seb
>> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>> 
>> Le Oct 10, 2012 à 17:31, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> a écrit :
>> 
>>> Hey all,
>>> 
>>> Just wanted to let you know what I am working on right now. It is very early but Matthias loves e-mail so I thought I would throw this out there.
>>> 
>>> Basically, right now all I am doing is working on keeping track of the status of data in DataManager. Assuming a new dataSync setting is set to true, these are the things I am planning.
>>> 
>>>    • New record is added to store, status is set to NEW and a UUID is generated
>>>    • Record is updated, status is set to MODIFIED
>>>    • Record is removed, status is set to REMOVED (data is not actually removed, future will need to keep storage limits in mind)
>>>    • Add a new sync method that will run through the data and sync with the server. Assumes client is data of record for now during development until we can determine a strategy for informing the client how the server tracks data status and how it should be informed that this data is being synced
>>>        • This brings us back to the discussion about sending metadata to the client on first app load. That metadata could inform the client of the sync strategy
>>> 
>>> There's probably more to this but these are my original thoughts right now.
>>> 
>>> Kris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> -- qmx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list