[aerogear-dev] release versioning

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)

well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)

>
> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029

I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version

-M

>
> thoughts?
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>
>>
>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>
>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
>> you would call it).
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> -M
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf