[aerogear-dev] Query/Paging Brainstorm

[Matthias Wessendorf]

that is a nice document

thx for sharing

-M

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
> The way github does paging looks nice,
>
> http://developer.github.com/v3/#pagination
>
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>
> Howdy!
>
>
> As we discussed on our team meeting today, having basic query and pagination
> support would be cool.
>
>
> Here are some suggestions, gathered from previous conversations around the
> topic, and from some BaaS providers in the wild.
>
>
> Paging:
>
>
> 1) /cars/?limit=10&offset=3
>
> 2) /cars/?limit=10&skip=3
>
>
> Is the skip the number of pages, or the literal item count to start on?
>
> Also, we would want a way to get back a total #, and page #'s give a page
> size.  This may be a separate call - wdyt?
>
>
> Query:
>
>
> 1) /cars/query?color=blue
>
> 2) /cars/?query={"color":"red", "owner":"summers"}
>
> 3) /cars/?where={"brand":"BMW"}
>
> 4) /cars/?query={"engine":{"cylinders": 8}}
>
> 5) /cars/?query={"engine":{"cylinders":{"$gt":6}}}
>
>
> This is not set into stone, just ideas,
>
>
> I guess it's a matter of agreeing :) the main work is on the "ag
> server component".
>
> Question.... do we want to keep it flexible? E.g. if AG clients are
> used for a backend that does not use "limit" for the pagination?
> (I guess kinda similar to what we have on the endpoints, where you can
> override the default)
>
>
> Where would you override this?  In the pipeline creation?
>
> Also, and opinions on using matrix parameters instead of query parameters?
> For now we would need to combine with #PathParam & PathSegments.  See
> http://docs.jboss.org/resteasy/docs/3.0-beta-1/userguide/html_single/index.html#_PathParam_and_PathSegment
> for details.
>
> This would allow future nesting of queries.
>
>
> and I do think that anything above exact matches should go after 1.0
>
>
> fine w/ me
>
>
> +1
>
>
> -M
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -- qmx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> aerogear-dev mailing list
>
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf