[aerogear-dev] code formatting
Douglas Campos
qmx at qmx.me
Thu Sep 13 15:36:31 EDT 2012
On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
> would it be better to put it here or keep both
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-427
The contributing page links to the code style stuff.
>
>
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Jay Balunas wrote:
>>
>>> We should combine this with a general review of our developer coding standards here - https://github.com/aerogear/ide-config
>>
>> I still think that ide-config is collateral to a document describing what we use.
>> I've opened https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-435 to track this
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was talking with kris today about JS formatting, and he showed me this [1].
>>>>
>>>> Even if I hate some of the proposed styles, having consistency wins over personal preferences, and we don't have decent JS autoformatters, AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections to following this as our guideline for JS code?
>>>>
>>>> [1]:https://github.com/rwldrn/idiomatic.js/
>>>>
>>>> -- qmx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> -- qmx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list