[aerogear-dev] code formatting

Douglas Campos qmx at qmx.me
Thu Sep 13 15:36:31 EDT 2012



On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Lucas Holmquist wrote:

> would it be better to put it here or keep both
> 
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-427
The contributing page links to the code style stuff.

> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Jay Balunas wrote:
>> 
>>> We should combine this with a general review of our developer coding standards here - https://github.com/aerogear/ide-config
>> 
>> I still think that ide-config is collateral to a document describing what we use.
>> I've opened https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-435 to track this
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I was talking with kris today about JS formatting, and he showed me this [1].
>>>> 
>>>> Even if I hate some of the proposed styles, having consistency wins over personal preferences, and we don't have decent JS autoformatters, AFAIK.
>>>> 
>>>> Any objections to following this as our guideline for JS code?
>>>> 
>>>> [1]:https://github.com/rwldrn/idiomatic.js/
>>>> 
>>>> -- qmx
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> -- qmx
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-- qmx




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list