[aerogear-dev] [aerogear-android-todo]

Glen Daniels glen at thoughtcraft.com
Thu Sep 20 22:16:48 EDT 2012


Hey guys,

I figured that the Android stuff is sufficiently "prototypish" at this
phase that it wasn't hugely important to keep the history, which is why
I didn't merge over from
https://github.com/gdaniels/android-data/tree/master/android.  If we'd
rather have all the individual commits, I can do that (and if so,
merging an entire repo's commits into another one isn't something I've
done before, so I'd love pointers).

I'm not sure what the commit you referenced has to do with it, though,
Bruno?

I'll respond to qmx's other comments in a separate reply.

Thanks,
--Glen

On 9/20/12 9:38 PM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> Comments inline….
> 
> 
> -- 
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
> 
> On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
> 
>> Howdy
>>
>> I was reviewing aerogear-android-todo, and noticed some issues
>>
>> 1) Why there is no history on the project? (and consequently,
>> ownership history - passos contributed code hasn't got attribution)
>> - even in cases of big rewrites and start-overs, it's nice to keep the
>> commits, as the history of the incremental changes say a lot about the
>> rationale/train of thought that lead to the final solution
> Really? What's happened? Have we lost our contributions? Weird because
> at least on JavaScript, Kris has kept the
> ownership https://github.com/aerogear/as-quickstarts/commit/f3fe1aa4274487f711615687ef55044d11bf384a
> 
> Why the same is not happening on android? Does anyone need help to do it?
> 
> My suggestion is revert it and rebase with our contributions.
>  
>> 2) Why aren't we following the maven project layout, as suggested by
>> the archetype we are using?
>> 3) Why the API and the example app are intermixed?
>> - Ideally these should be separate repositories, like the iOS version
>>
>> -- qmx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 



More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list