[aerogear-dev] [aerogear-android-todo]

[Bruno Oliveira]

Glen, please rebase it and give the credits to the author. 

This is not our common workflow. 


-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile



On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Glen Daniels wrote:

> Hey qmx,
> 
> On 9/20/12 9:29 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
> > 1) Why there is no history on the project? (and consequently, ownership history - passos contributed code hasn't got attribution)
> > - even in cases of big rewrites and start-overs, it's nice to keep the commits, as the history of the incremental changes say a lot about the rationale/train of thought that lead to the final solution
> > 
> 
> 
> (See last msg)
> 
> > 2) Why aren't we following the maven project layout, as suggested by the archetype we are using?
> 
> We're following a simple convention for the Android maven plugin
> (http://code.google.com/p/maven-android-plugin/). You can see a similar
> example at
> https://github.com/jayway/maven-android-plugin-samples/tree/master/helloflashlight.
> The idea is that it's an Android project first and a maven project second.
> 
> > 3) Why the API and the example app are intermixed?
> > - Ideally these should be separate repositories, like the iOS version
> > 
> 
> 
> Definitely! This is mentioned in TODO comments in the code. I wanted
> to get the prototype up quickly to link it to
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-353, and didn't have time to
> both merge in the new UI and split out the API jar. Next on my list.
> 
> --Glen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20120921/56939b6c/attachment-0001.html