[aerogear-dev] [aerogear-android-todo]

[Matthias Wessendorf]

correct - also indicating the same layout (see <sourceDirectory /> tag
in that article)

-M

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Glen Daniels <glen at thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 9/21/12 7:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>> 2) Why aren't we following the maven project layout, as suggested by the archetype we are using?
>>>
>>> We're following a simple convention for the Android maven plugin
>>> (http://code.google.com/p/maven-android-plugin/).  You can see a similar
>>> example at
>>> https://github.com/jayway/maven-android-plugin-samples/tree/master/helloflashlight.
>>>  The idea is that it's an Android project first and a maven project second.
>>
>> I think using this format is right...
>> http://www.vogella.com/articles/AndroidBuildMaven/article.html
>
> AFAICT, that article just points back to the maven-android-plugin, and
> doesn't say anything different about structure.  Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf