[aerogear-dev] [Aerogear Pipeline] Support for nested endpoints

[Sebastien Blanc]

+1 for approach #1
And since approach #1 seems quite popular the Gist has been updated with
the JS version of #1 https://gist.github.com/cvasilak/4a5f51b8d1ad9cc7f21b



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>wrote:

> +1 for approach #1. Nice write up on this Christos, thanks for that!
>
>
> On 10 April 2013 18:32, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
>> yeah - same here, :) +1 on proposal #1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>>> Approach #1 hands down
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130411/4f8eb8d5/attachment.html