[aerogear-dev] [aerogear-controller] Multipart support

[Summers Pittman]

On 4/16/2013 3:59 AM, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> Nice write up !
> Beside the controller side, and talking about consistency, did our 
> Pipes support mutlipart ? A common use case would be a hybrid app that 
> wants to upload a picture from the camera, would be really nice if we 
> can do this with a Pipe.
Hopefully I can get something working with this for my Ajug demo :))
(source so far is https://github.com/secondsun/AjugBook )
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Daniel Bevenius 
> <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I'll take a look at what the mapping might look like and post back
>     with a suggestion.
>
>     >same here, not sure if still (good) maintained, since it
>     (multipart) is now part of the servlet spec;
>     Good point here Matthias. Let me take another look into this and
>     see if we can somehow use the MultipartConfig from the spec. This
>     would have been our first choice, but as far as I know this is not
>     supported from a filter but only when used on a Servlet. I'll see
>     if there is another way to do this.
>
>     Thanks for the feedback!
>
>
>
>     On 15 April 2013 17:50, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>     <mailto:matzew at apache.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>         On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Summers Pittman
>         <supittma at redhat.com <mailto:supittma at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>             On Monday, April 15, 2013 10:00:14 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
>             > Hi!
>             >
>             > I've created a gist to discuss possible ways to implement
>             > multipart-support in AeroGear Controller:
>             > https://gist.github.com/danbev/fec1fe498cabdf0aef6a
>             >
>             > Any suggestion/comments are welcome.
>             >
>             > /Dan
>             I don't mind relying on commons-fileupload.
>
>
>         same here, not sure if still (good) maintained, since it
>         (multipart) is now part of the servlet spec;
>
>
>             It would be nice (but more work) if we could marshall
>             objects with
>             multipart like we can with JSON.  For fields which aren't
>             files that is
>             easy.  For fields which are files we would have some
>             behavior to define.
>
>             I'm all for making easy bindings for common types (maybe
>             byte[], File,
>             InputStream, BufferedImage) and having an easy way to
>             inject custom
>             processing (perhaps with annotations).
>
>
>         that would be nice, to have an easy mapping
>
>
>             >
>             >
>             > _______________________________________________
>             > aerogear-dev mailing list
>             > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>             <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>             > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             aerogear-dev mailing list
>             aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>             <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         Matthias Wessendorf
>
>         blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>         sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>         twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         aerogear-dev mailing list
>         aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     aerogear-dev mailing list
>     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130416/a81d5e8f/attachment.html