[aerogear-dev] AG-1286 resolution, what to do with secondsun/pusheedemo

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> In the meeting this morning and in the JIRA we discussed moving the
>> PusheeDemo code into the cookbook application.
>>
>> Arguments for:
>> Push code is now in the main repo.
>> Push demo joins other demo code
>>
>> Arguments against:
>> Push demo is no longer stand alone
>> Will need to document the push demo code is in the cookbook
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> Since the PusheeDemo is also used for the tutorial (see [1]), it should be
> standalone or at least it should be not too complex to get up and running,
> when interested in our GCM bits
>
> However, if the cookbook is easy to setup and not 5 or more unrelated
> steps (==> to 'push' unrelated steps) are required for running the thing, I
> am fine
> in moving this to the cookbook project.
>


Any comments ?



>
> -Matthias
>
>
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-21
>
>
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130801/83a45b2b/attachment.html