[aerogear-dev] [SimplePush] pushEndpoint

[Daniel Bevenius]

> What's the timeframe of the change?
I can't really speak for all parties here, but for SimplePush and
UnifiedPush we should be able to have this ready by Monday afternoon ready
to be included in the OpenShift cartridge. That is if Kris and Luke, or
anyone else for that matter, does not object.



On 8 August 2013 13:30, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:53:37 +0200
> Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Yesterday Kris pointed out that we are not following the SimplePush
> Spec[1]
> > when it comes to the 'pushEndpoint' that is returned when registering a
> > channel. The spec shows that an absolute URL is returned but we are
> > returning a relative URL.
> >
> > For the AeroGear SimplePush Server this is being address by
> AGPUSH-261[2],
> > and an instance that returns absolute URL is available at
> > http://endpointurldns-dbevenius.rhcloud.com:8000/simplepush.
> >
> > This change will affect the JavaScript client, the UnifiedPush Server,
> the
> > Admin UI and possibly QE integration tests.
>
> I don't think that impact on QE integration tests is that big, it should
> be a
> simple change. What's the timeframe of the change?
>
> >
> > I won't go into all the changes for the components listed above as others
> > can provide more accurate information about them if needed. Just wanted
> to
> > give a heads up to all about this.
> >
> > /Dan
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/SimplePush/Protocol#PushServer_-.3E_UserAgent_2
> > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-261
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130808/9a12efe5/attachment.html