[aerogear-dev] Ordering of the icons / technologies

[Kris Borchers]

I also just saw the merged PR that went back to original order. Let's just leave it that way. No need to nitpick ourselves to death on this.

On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:

> I think the original order came from the fact that the JS bits were the first to be released. I think listing in alpha order makes sense.
> 
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
> 
>> Well, IMO iOS should go to the end of the list because it sucks, just
>> kidding.
>> 
>> Agreed about ordering by alphabet.
>> 
>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I was wondering about something...
>>> 
>>> the list:
>>> * iOS
>>> * Android
>>> * Web
>>> * Hybrid
>>> 
>>> Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has
>>> higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc....
>>> 
>>> I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-)
>>> 
>>> So my 'politically correct' list would be like:
>>> * Android
>>> * Hybrid
>>> * iOS
>>> * Web
>>> 
>>> 
>>> does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect
>>> 'misinterpretations' ? 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> -- 
>> abstractj
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev