[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush overview image

[Yavuz Selim YILMAZ]

Hi,

So, if the numbers are representing the action flow, my second comment comes. :)

Here is the flow:

1 - Developer registers…
2 - installations register…
3 - event invokes…
4 - message is delivered…
5 - installations "NO ACTION???"

First four item defines and states the action, though 5th is obvious (installations receives or similar), I think the action should also be stated on the 5th.

Regards,

---
Yavuz Selim Yilmaz
SUNY at Buffalo
Computer Science and Engineering
PhD Candidate

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote:
>> I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image.
>> 
> 
> Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version:
> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
> 
> Hylke
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I personally like it
>>> 
>>> On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote:
>>> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
>>> How's that?
>>> 
>>> Hylke
>>> 
>>> On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>> Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then?
>>>> 
>>>> Hylke
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>> Hi Hylke,
>>>> 
>>>> can we get an update on this image:
>>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
>>>> 
>>>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations"
>>>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client
>>>> 
>>>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-)
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>> 
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>>> 
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130813/fdd0ad10/attachment.html