[aerogear-dev] TODO app abandon - continues....

[Summers Pittman]

Drop it, passos and I have been wishlisting making a server side 
thingie to run tests and cookbooks against for a while.  Maybe we will 
actually do it one of the decades :)

 From a side perspective, I've been working on making a DevNexus app and 
I will be dog fooding a lot of Aerogear for it :)

On Thu 05 Dec 2013 08:38:15 AM EST, Christos Vasilakis wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel at passos.me
> <mailto:daniel at passos.me>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Corinne,
>>
>> My idea is move all we need to example apps and integration test for
>> a new server project or use aerogear-jaxrs-demo
>
> +1
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Passos
>>
>> On December 5, 2013 at 10:52:12 AM, Corinne Krych
>> (corinnekrych at gmail.com <mailto://corinnekrych@gmail.com>) wrote:
>>
>>> I understand the issues and problems but that brings the topic how
>>> are we going to demo, let's say in iOS cookbook features that
>>> involved server part?
>>> TODO app were used to demo Pipe. I cross reference TODO app in here:
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios-cookbook#table-of-content
>>>
>>> Something raised in this thread
>>> http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Android-multipart-cookbook-component-td3553.html
>>>
>>>
>>> ++
>>> Corinne
>>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius
>>> <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 On dropping it.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 5 December 2013 13:32, Bruno Oliveira <abstractj at redhat.com <mailto:abstractj at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> > Good morning peeps, regarding this threadhttp://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-TODO-app-abandoning-td4576.html.
>>> Somehow we agreed in the past to no longer support this app
>>> http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23aerogear/2013/%23aerogear.2013-01-28.log.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I’ve been chatting with Christos about my concern around this app:
>>> >
>>> > - This app still make use of ag-controller and outdated versions of ag security
>>> > - Maintain it is very time consuming
>>> > - We need to monitor OpenShift because after a period of inactivity the app will be disabled
>>> >
>>> > That said I vote for just drop or no longer maintain this app and update our integration tests. But before move forward with it, I would like to hear the concerns from the team about it.
>>> >
>>> > If I don’t hear anything, the application will be dropped from OpenShift. If the team agree on maintain it, we need a call for arms to do it.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > abstractj
>>> >
>>> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> >aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> >aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev