[aerogear-dev] how about this API for sync?

[Summers Pittman]

On 12/11/2013 09:56 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> >One of my concerns with Couch is it is another 
> application/server/dependency to package and keep up with.
> The suggestion is that we do something similar to CouchDB and perhaps 
> lend some ideas from their protocol and how they handle conflicts. Not 
> that we base this on CouchDB, sorry if this was confusing.
> A server implementation might start off delegating to a CouchDB 
> instance just to get up and running. This way our client libs would 
> have something work against.
>
Ok, just wanted to make sure.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11 December 2013 15:47, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com 
> <mailto:supittma at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 12/11/2013 04:44 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
>     > Very very very simple with CounchDB +4242424242
>     >
>     One of my concerns with Couch is it is another
>     application/server/dependency to package and keep up with.
>
>     Of course if we want to build an aerogear-sync-server application
>     instead of an aerogear-sync-sererver spec that servers can
>     implement it
>     makes a lot more sense.
>
>     Can CouchDB be embedded in a Java EE application?
>     _______________________________________________
>     aerogear-dev mailing list
>     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20131211/91c3e4a4/attachment.html