[aerogear-dev] Aerogear.js for CRUD

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Thu Dec 19 03:57:53 EST 2013


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter at redhat.com> wrote:

> It sounds like, at a minimum, we have a bug in the Forge scaffolding to
> support Aerogear.js
>
> My next concern would be that since this "feature" was introduced with
> jQuery 1.9, it could be that a LOT of the world's REST endpoints are no
> longer POST compatible with Aerogear.js, nothing to be done about that
> except to document it well for Aerogear.js when the time to promote it
> heavily comes up.
>

Before you used Aerogear, you had also a version using only jquery, right ?
Did you had the same behavior when doing a POST ? If yes, it's not
only Aerogear based apps that have an issue but all the webapps around the
world using jquery's ajax 1.9 stuff.



>
> Aerogear.js doc issues also include confusion of datamanager/store
> (getting started guide is not clear for when those are needed) and the
> seemingly missing docs for Pipe.  Plus, the first example seen by the
> end-user should include the use of iteration through the results, not an
> underscore template which hides some of the details.
>

Could you open a new thread/jiras for the doc issues so that we don't mix
all the things in one thread ?


>
>
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > To my understanding, HTTP 201 should always return created entity and its
> > content should be based on Content-Type header field.
> >
> > See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:25:53 -0500 (EST)
> > Vineet Reynolds Pereira <vpereira at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It would be better to treat this as a flag to be enabled during REST
> resource
> >> scaffolding. It would allow users to choose how the resource behaves -
> >> * send a 201 response with Location header,
> >> * send a 201 response with Location header and also a response entity.
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20131219/d2a8edc2/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list