[aerogear-dev] Pipes on Android

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Kris Borchers <kborcher at redhat.com> wrote:
> I am +1 for option #1 with good docs pointing out the support lib requirement very clearly in docs


I agree with Kris.

-M

>
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, Pipes on Android are implemented using an AsyncTask and the
>> callbacks are fired on the UI thread.  In the case where the Activity
>> which made the request which launched the task is killed, an application
>> using Aerogear will crash.  This is bad. Additionally the internal
>> mechanisms of the request itself aren't easily reachable by the
>> developer.  This means we can't get status information (is the request
>> completed, is there data, cancel the request, etc) easily.
>>
>> Last week at the F2F I chatted up Matzew and a few other guys and put
>> together a Pipe proposal (http://bit.ly/12MzeOx).  I've implemented it
>> and ported some example code and it works.  However, it requires a lot
>> of boilerplate code to manage the Activity life cycle correctly.  We can
>> abstract the boilerplate if we write our own extensions to the base
>> Android activity classes and our users extend those classes.  However
>> there are about 12 common classes in multiple libraries which can be
>> used and it is pain to maintain.
>>
>> In Android 3.0+ Google provides a Loader API which handles this
>> boilerplate on its own.  Even better, they've extended their base
>> classes for us.  After doing more research today, I've come to the
>> conclusion that Pipe and friends can lean on Loader to do what we want
>> with minimal if any API changes.  However, this means on Android 2.3 our
>> users will have to include the Android support library.  This is usually
>> used by most projects anyway, but it will be something to point out in
>> the docs.
>>
>> So my questions to the list is, which should be done?
>>
>> In order of my preference:
>>  1. Use the Loader API and require that users targeting older versions
>> of Android include the support libs (which they are probably doing already)
>>  2. Use the boilerplate heavy API proposal and pass the coding onto the
>> user
>>  3. Make our library 3.0+ only
>>  4. Extend all the base classes and manage the boilerplate
>>
>> 3 & 4 aren't really good options, but I am including them for completeness.
>>
>> Summers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf