[aerogear-dev] Paging Demo

Daniel Bevenius daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
Sat Jan 12 05:08:42 EST 2013


Great, lets go with 'AG-' prefix then.




On 11 January 2013 18:24, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

>
> On 11/01/2013, at 15:10, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
> > I guess what I meant is I'm not specifically +1 for X- prefix but just
> some sort of prefix in general. It just makes it easier for devs when
> looking through headers to see what is being sent. Even something like AG-
> or AeroGear- would be better IMO than no prefix.
>
> d'oh, +1 - thought I've typed it…
>
> AG- looks nicer - less bandwidth ;)
>
> -- qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130112/5aa7276b/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list