[aerogear-dev] REST: auth: user registration endpoint

Kris Borchers kris at redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 01:00:12 EST 2013


On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:

> >is your -1 only for the TODO demo app, or also for the ag-security library?
> I think we could keep the server side in the both the TODO app and ag-security as is, and have overrides in the client examples which might be useful for users to see examples of. 

I can be convinced that the TODO app can be left as is and override with the clients. I don't agree with the library itself having a different default than the clients though. Seems like that would be more confusing than helpful for someone trying to use both.
> 
> 
> On 15 January 2013 06:45, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 Let the client override this. I think it might be nice to show that this can be overriden and have an example to point users to.
> 
> 
> is your -1 only for the TODO demo app, or also for the ag-security library?
> 
> -M
> 
>  
> 
> I've created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-816 so that we can track this.
> 
> 
> 
> On 14 January 2013 20:39, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> nice idea
> 
> -1 to TODO changing
> 
> On 14/01/2013, at 16:54, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > +1 on having security be enroll.
> >
> > -1 on having TODO be enroll.  This is because the TODO app should
> > demonstrate that there is the ability to change things.
> >
> > On 01/14/2013 01:50 PM, Kris Borchers wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> our client libries are using the "auth/enroll" value for the actual
> >>> registration request, examples:
> >>> - https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-ios/blob/master/AeroGear-iOS/AeroGear-iOS/security/AGAuthConfiguration.m#L40
> >>> - https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/blob/master/src/authentication/adapters/rest.js#L212
> >>> - https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android/blob/master/src/org/jboss/aerogear/android/authentication/AuthenticationConfig.java#L29
> >>>
> >>> However, the server uses a different default ("auth/register"):
> >>> - https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/security/rest/service/AuthenticationService.java#L48
> >>> - https://github.com/aerogear/TODO/blob/master/server/src/main/java/org/aerogear/todo/server/security/rest/AuthenticationEndpoint.java#L51
> >>>
> >>> It was a decision from the past, that we have this "model", however -
> >>> rethinking causes some concerns... Is that really ideal? Wouldn't it
> >>> be just
> >>> better to have matching default, on the client AND the server ?
> >>>
> >>> Please vote:
> >>> [+1] let's change the server default to match the "enroll" setting
> >>> from the client libraries
> >>> [0] I don't care
> >>> [-1] nah, let's keep all as is, since the client can override everything
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers!
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>
> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130115/ddea6bf7/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list