[aerogear-dev] Pagination Requirements Spec

[Matthias Wessendorf]

I think the 'web linking' reads a bit odd... (at first glance) - but it's a
standard (RFC 5988), so I am in fav. of using that syntax for decorating
the response

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we've created the following gist[1] to specify our requirements for
> pagination. We can discuss this on the mailing list and then update the doc
> as we go along. This will later be turned into a page under the spec
> section of the site.
>
> Nothing has been decide yet even if it might read like it has in the
> document.
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/4537431
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130115/a292a5bc/attachment.html