[aerogear-dev] Client Paging Strawman

Douglas Campos qmx at qmx.me
Tue Jan 15 14:38:11 EST 2013


On 15/01/2013, at 17:32, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:

> OK, so here is where I stand. I don't think there is any way to have the API's match identically between JS and the others. It sounds like Android and iOS are getting closer to agreement but as they get closer, it seems they get further away from what makes sense for JS. Basically, anything that involves creating a new object to maintain paged pipes rather than just using any other pipe and overloading the read method to do paging doesn't make sense to me. IMO, JS should move forward with basically what was written up in the strawman as that feels like the best solution for JS.

I felt a great disturbance in the Force. (reply is on the way ;))

-- qmx


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list