[aerogear-dev] Pagination Requirements Spec

Daniel Bevenius daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 08:52:59 EST 2013


>I'm still worried about having something explicit for the number of records
available
It would have to be optional I think as we can't really know if the backend
has this support or even wants to support this if there are large amounts
of records. Is this your concern?

/Dan


On 17 January 2013 14:45, <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:47:02AM +0100, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> > >I think, it's OK to NOT send that limit/offset overhead to someone
> > >that knows about it already. That's what you are saying, right ?
> > Yep, so we would just return the 'AG-Total' in this case.
> I'm still worried about having something explicit for the number of
> records available
>
> -- qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130117/a2e416d8/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list