[aerogear-dev] [Java Sender API] future of AsyncHttpClient

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Folks !
> As you know the current Java Sender API comes today with 2 different
> implementations :
>
> - Resteasy client (used by default)
> - AsyncHttpClient
>
> I discussed a bit with Matzew and we agreed that we should probably remove
> the AsyncHttpClient implementation and just keep the resteasy client, wdyt
> ?
>


yep, I'd prefer one client (based on RestEasy). Also that means we don't
need all the JavaSender, DefaultSender etc...

We just have one client, and need to name it "reasonably".

I'd also argue that we should worry that the client can be injected, using
CDI. Makes sense when being used on JavaEE backends



>
> Seb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130710/e43f61cd/attachment.html