[aerogear-dev] Sending messages to a (few) specific variant(s)

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> You mean adding this to the Java Sender API ?
>>>
>>
>> I thought adding it to the SERVER, but yeah the Java Client needs to
>> reflect that as well :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm okay with it but we just have to keep in mind that the backend app
>>> using the sender should be totally agnostic to who it send messages to (And
>>> the backend app should not know the variant ids, only the push app id, so
>>> .... ) maybe using another terminology ?
>>>
>>
>> Not sure I agree.
>>
> Sure it is not about agreeing or disagreeing here  ;) but we should
> discuss this. Maybe the backend could query the push server to retrive the
> available variants ?
>


Interesting point - but that's a different discussion :)

Not sure I want the business backend to query the PushServer, asking for
variants .... ( also a right issue).

Even so... if that hook would be added to the server...., we would still
need the   "variants" : {arrayOfVariantIDs} on the REST endpoint, and a
reflection of that, on the JAva Sender, right ?

-Matthias


>
>> A marketing backend could have a special "coupon" for Tablet users.
>> Again, it's up the business logic :-)
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> For adding support to "select" some variants (e.g. "Android Tablet
>>>> optimized variant" _and_ "iPad mini variant" _and_ "SimplePush variant"),
>>>> when sending messages, I'd like to update the Selective Sender API and add
>>>> a new field:
>>>>
>>>>     "variants" : {arrayOfVariantIDs}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IMO the broadcast should NOT have such an option, since it broadcasts
>>>> to everything. At least that's my understanding of it.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130710/4311b0e5/attachment.html