[aerogear-dev] PushEE testing POC

[Sebastien Blanc]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Do we have a good reason to use Spock instead of conventional tools in
> Java? Something that only spock can solve?
>
> Our tests can be written in Java? Maybe I missed the point, but have a
> project based in personal taste doesn't make sense to me.
>
> I would love to write my tests with rspec and JRuby, which doesn't mean
> I will start to do it.
>

Like Corinne said, it's beyond the language. It is more about the
readability  / auto documentation of the tests ...


> Corinne Krych wrote:
> > Don't focus on Groovy (if it makes you sad), emphasis is on Spock!
> >
> > #HappyPuppy :)
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> > On Jul 14, 2013, at 4:34 AM, Douglas Campos<qmx at qmx.me>  wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Karel Piwko wrote:
> >>> I have evaluated multiple API approaches, described here[3], Groovy
> and Spock
> >>> seems to be the best to me.
> >> And now I regret badly having missed the word "Groovy" between the
> >> provided options when I've gone to review the push server codebase.
> >>
> >> #sadpanda :(
> >>
> >> --
> >> qmx
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130715/5f498595/attachment.html