[aerogear-dev] SimplePush Polyfill Changes

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Fri Jul 26 10:28:19 EDT 2013


Sounds good and don't really breaks Mozilla's protocol / flow as you
mentionned that for them the connection is implicit (and therefore happens
before the register, just like what you suggest)



On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>wrote:

> I think this sounds reasonable.
>
>
> On 26 July 2013 16:15, Kris Borchers <kris.borchers at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Before I make a change to this polyfill I wanted to make sure there were
>> no concerns or objections. Basically, what I want to do is change the usage
>> so that calls to navigator.push.register() or
>> navigator.push.registrations() (not yet added) would have to be done after
>> a connection is established. Currently, a user can call either of those
>> methods at any time which causes headaches when trying to account for
>> registrations that happen before the connection and also register
>> previously used channels stored in localStorage. Just as an FYI, this is
>> not an issue for Mozilla because they already know they have a connection
>> when their JS executes because the browser creates the connection during
>> startup. I have done a LOT of work to try to account for race conditions
>> which may occur and in the process added a LOT of extra code. And even with
>> all of that work, I'm still not 100% sure that all race conditions have
>> been accounted for once this code is used at scale with lots of connec!
>>  tions.
>>
>> So what am I suggesting? I would like to require our users to create a
>> connection to the SimplePush server and do their interactions with that
>> server in the success (or onConnect or what ever we want to call it)
>> callback. After that, all code would be identical to the Mozilla APIs.
>> Then, we could just write a brief guide or tutorial on transitioning code
>> between our implementation and Mozilla's to highlight the small difference.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130726/9d39ef1d/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list