[aerogear-dev] Website restyle Was: Help needed setting ag.org for testing

[Jay Balunas]

Does, would, could, should the push admin console have the same sort of styling to make a distinct tie in with AeroGear?

On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

> wow, that looks really nice!
> 
> I DO like the changes!
> 
> +1 :-)
> 
> 
> Also looking forward to a "responsive" version :-))
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Hylke,
> 
> I really like the updates you have made!  I can certainly see where the responsive design could really make this great on different size screens!
> 
> I'll be really curious what others think as well.
> 
> -Jay
> 
> On Jun 9, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Hylke Bons wrote:
> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>> Thanks for the replies. I finally got the website to run locally using rvm.
>> I had some issues sending emails and didn't even realise this message actually arrived.
>> 
>> Jay asked me to fix some issues with the website before upcoming traffic flows from the upcoming conferences. I did the things he requested, but couldn't help myself redoing more of the style...
>> 
>> Here are some screenshots:
>> 
>> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/new_style_frontpage.png
>> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/new_style_page.png
>> 
>> It's all pretty plain still, but we can use this as a base to work from the coming weeks and iterate on the design. My main goal was to get something together that is easier to read and parse.
>> 
>> The pull request is here: 
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/85
>> 
>> Some things to note:
>> 
>> - It's not responsive yet (I'll do this as soon as possible)
>> - Not all pages look perfect yet. This is mainly due to inconsistencies in the markdown used.
>> - I've used the adjusted feature descriptions on the frontpage that we discussed here earlier. 
>> 
>> I hope you like it. (and apologies if I'm moving too fast :)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Hylke
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 07/06/2013 19:17, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>> For Ruby 1.9.x installation, I used "rvm". Not sure if that is "best", but worked :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org#building
>>> 
>>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Anyone who can help me out?
>>>> 
>>>> Hylke
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130610/4ce7dd67/attachment-0001.html