[aerogear-dev] New GH Repos and their names?

[Sebastien Blanc]

+1



On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Bevenius
<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>wrote:

> +1 Those names work for me.
>
>
> On 11 June 2013 16:33, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
>> So, what about this list:
>> * aerogear-simplepush-server
>> * aerogear-push-ios-demo
>> * aerogear-push-ios- registration
>> * aerogear-unified-push-server
>> * aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>>
>> greetings,
>> matthias
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>> j
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, June 10, 2013, Daniel Passos wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to add aerogear- on repo name
>>>>
>>>> -1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>>>> I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
>>>>
>>>> Is it for server?
>>>> wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
>>>> If we have client, we have server, right?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok... :)
>>>>
>>>> not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the
>>>> repo name), but that's not really that important...
>>>>
>>>> for consistency, why not ?
>>>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>>>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>>>> aerogear-push-registration-ios
>>>> aerogear-unified-push
>>>> aerogear-unified-push-java-client
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> yeah, these names do make sense!
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So the repo names so far:
>>>>
>>>> aerogear-push-ios-demo
>>>> aerogear-simplepush-server
>>>> push-registration-ios
>>>> unified-push
>>>> unified-push-java-client
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
>>>> consistency ;)
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> qmx
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: <http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130611/866f159e/attachment-0001.html