[aerogear-dev] Versioning x Roadmap x Jiras puzzle

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Jun 17 08:10:58 EDT 2013


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:

>
> On Jun 13, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> > Good morning all, today I was thinking about a problem that the other
> > projects might face with.
> >
> > Our versioning policy is pretty straightforward
> > http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/reference/AeroGearVersioningPolicy/ and
> > to me makes sense. Here comes the problem, as you know
> > aerogear-security-shiro was released and would be crazy to start with
> > 1.0.x, for this reason I started with 0.1.0. Question:
> >
> > - Where 0.1.0 release should be into the roadmap?
> > http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearSecurity/
>
> I think of aerogear-security-picketlink and aerogear-security-shiro as
> adapters to aerogear-security.
>
> So for the AeroGear Security roadmap, i would think the shiro "adapter"
> should go under 1.X.0 since it's a new feature
>


sounds reasonable


>
>
> >
> > Might be confusing if we just add 0.1.0 into the roadmap.
> >
> > - How to properly file jiras?
> > The correct would be 0.1.0 for jiras associated with
> > aerogear-security-shiro, but might be very confusing for newcomers when
> > they start to look at our roadmap.
> >
>
> I think for filling JIRA's, we might just want to stick with the umbrella
> aerogear-security numbers,  or else create a new sub projects for these
>

+1


>
> > - In the situation where you must bump the minor release, for example
> > aerogear-security 1.0.2. What's the appropriate approach to follow?
> > Create a new release on Jira and update the roadmap?
> >
> > I'm asking these questions because is impossible our components have the
> > same version of the others with projects growth.
> > --
> > abstractj
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130617/9281be17/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list