[aerogear-dev] Project Meetings, Hangouts and Stuff

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Mon Jun 17 14:51:43 EDT 2013


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:

> we need someone to write a hangout plugin that translates what we say to
> IRC
>

perhaps a better "meeting minutes" solution would make it more open ?


>
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I think in general the idea of IRC meetings is ok. My biggest concern is
> that our meetings will be much longer. In order to have good discussions
> while typing everything will just take more time. I feel like we resolve a
> lot of misunderstandings via hangouts that seem to go unresolved when
> trying to express our thoughts in IRC or e-mail.
>
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Generally, I do like IRC based meetings.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>wrote:
>
>> My suggestion is fire the invitations 10 minutes before and if we face
>> with any kind of issues switch to IRC meetings.
>>
>
>
> +1 that is a good option,
> but I guess the point that qmx is making is "lack of information". I think
> that things are more explicit when the meeting is on IRC.
>
> + there is an archived version of it.   Right now we post the agenda,
> which is good, but this does not always reflect the discussions around some
> of the items on the agenda.
>
> On the other hand, I can see what qmx also stated: A video conference may
> feel more productive.
>
>
> Why not trying two meetings, based on IRC. Afterwards we can reflect
> things.
>
>
>
> -M
>
>
>
>>
>> Douglas Campos wrote:
>> > Howdy!
>> >
>> > Today after the hangout failure I realized how bad is for the project to
>> > have hangouts for the project meetings - and how they make us more
>> > closed than we should be.
>> > (just as a background, we did have IRC meetings in the past, but since
>> > we were 4 people only, having the hangouts "felt" more productive - and
>> > the benefits made the problems less obvious to us).
>> >
>> > So I propose that we move back to IRC meetings for now, and keep the
>> > hangouts only for internal topics and non-project stuff.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>>
>> --
>> abstractj
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130617/07674296/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list