[aerogear-dev] Android keys (Re: AeroGear Push Message Format)

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Tue Jun 18 08:15:23 EDT 2013


Summers, Passos,


wondering if we should/could honor "android" specific keys as well (similar
to the iOS keys that we "honor")

See:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/specs/aerogear-push-messages/index.markdown#ios-special-keys


-Matthias


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:

> reminder, that ID is just the primary key :-)
>
> meaningful are "pushApplicationID" and "variantID"
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Luke
>>
>> once this landed, it will be "pushApplicationID" and "variantID" - the ID
>> is than meaningless (at least for PushEE server).
>>
>> -M
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> plus plus
>>>
>>> On May 31, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-86
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On May 31, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> somehow the device needs to say: "I belong to android variant"
>>>>
>>>> besides the @Id /PK, we can have a second field / column that
>>>> represents:
>>>> * PushAppID
>>>> * VariantID
>>>>
>>>> Yup. Having these would solve that
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was that your question?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> something that i was thinking about after doing some examples is that
>>>>> i'm not sure how i feel about using the PK's of each table as the
>>>>> identifier to register/broadcast clients.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are sort of giving meaning to data that really shouldn't have
>>>>> meaning.  it should really only be used to identify the row.  It might be
>>>>> better to have another key on each table/object that is the identifier.
>>>>>
>>>>> So in one of the examples i did,  the app on the device will register
>>>>> the device with the push server,  but i needed to also include the id of
>>>>> the variant instance
>>>>>
>>>>> i guess i'm thinking if someone migrates their database,  these keys
>>>>> could get messed up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> wdyt?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> in selective push is:
>>>>> ==> variant: iOS  + alias: mwessendorf
>>>>> a valid criteria too?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> yes. let me update the related doc(s)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> TYPO:
>>>>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
>>>>> deviceType:iPadMini  + alias: mwessendorf
>>>>> or
>>>>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant)
>>>>> + deviceType:iPhone  + alias: mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>>>> matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych <
>>>>> corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile
>>>>> variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates)
>>>>> and device type?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or "iOS".
>>>>> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :)  - or "Android
>>>>> Table", "Andrpid phone", android what not
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure.... ideally there are several variants:
>>>>> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store
>>>>> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store
>>>>> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store
>>>>> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store
>>>>> etc :)
>>>>>
>>>>> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install an
>>>>> iOS application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Both aimed at defining categories.
>>>>>  Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be
>>>>> extended?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand categories, here
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and
>>>>> alias=john at gmail?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130618/1f02fb04/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list