[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush - REST endpoints
Matthias Wessendorf
matzew at apache.org
Tue Jun 18 12:05:42 EDT 2013
TAG is good :)
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
> Yes, the work from the security branch.
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org
> > <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>> wrote:
> >
> > What do you think about tag the current version and merge the
> security
> > branch? Only if you want to we also can release the version 0.1.0 on
> > maven central.
> >
> >
> > are u talking about the REST API doc (this thread)
> > or the (real :-)) work I did for security branch ?
> >
> >
> > Just let me know.
> >
> > Karel Piwko wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:26:26 +0200
> > > Sebastien Blanc<scm.blanc at gmail.com <mailto:scm.blanc at gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +9006
> > >> And we should check that the integrations tests are always in
> > sync with the
> > >> cookbook (use the same use cases / data) .
> > >
> > > Asciidoc provides a nice feature of including snippets of code
> > from real
> > > files into documentation. Not sure if that would be possible with
> > making groovy
> > > syntax for integration tests nicely fitting cookbook syntax, but
> > might be worth
> > > investigating ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > >> Seb
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Matthias
> > Wessendorf<matzew at apache.org <mailto:matzew at apache.org>>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Karel Piwko<kpiwko at redhat.com
> > <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:22:10 +0200
> > >>>> Matthias Wessendorf<matzew at apache.org
> > <mailto:matzew at apache.org>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> a little doc about the REST endpoints:
> > >>>>> https://gist.github.com/matzew/73ec38d853863e7bb1dd
> > >>>> Extremely helpful, thanks! I wish I'd found it before I was
> > wondering why
> > >>>> unified push server started returning 201 instead of 200.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I _think_ it would be nice IF the above "REST APIs" are also
> > describing
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>> "params" and HTTP headers that are required.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> These are currently (at least for sending) described in here:
> > >>>>>
> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-push-messages/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> What do you think?
> > >>>>> Should we merge the "message format" spec with the "Sender
> > REST-API"
> > >>>>> endpoint documentation?
> > >>>> Wouldn't they make a nice cookbook together if merged?
> > >>>>
> > >>> +1000
> > >>>
> > >>> I am currently on some security work, but I plan to merge the
> > "message
> > >>> format + REST API"
> > >>>
> > >>> I think in three different "chapters"
> > >>> * REST Management APIs (for creating PushApplication / Variant)
> > (+ crud
> > >>> workflow -> basically all used by the (future) Admin UI)
> > >>> * REST Auth Endpoint (Login/Logout and "enroll")
> > >>> * REST Sender (for sending push messages)
> > >>> * REST "Device Registration" (for the MobileVariantInstances
> (aka
> > >>> Installations))
> > >>>
> > >>> That ensure the doc is not too long.....
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>> Also, if we do the merge.... I'd update the above gist to
> > include other
> > >>>>> values/headers/params for the
> > >>>>> MobileVariant/PushApplication/Installation(aka
> > MobileVariantInstance) as
> > >>>>> well
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Matthias
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> > >>>
> > >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > --
> > abstractj
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130618/76da53ce/attachment-0001.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list