[aerogear-dev] Project Meetings, Hangouts and Stuff

[Matthias Wessendorf]

+1


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> For the RichFaces project we used IRC meetings and I thought it worked out
> really well!  We used meetbot [1], so had nice minutes, and once you get
> used to the hashtags it becomes much more productive.  Another nice benefit
> is that language becomes less of an issue, and there is little worry about
> talking over each other.
>
> As Qmx said we used to have IRC meetings and switched to hangout, but I
> think it is best if we switch back.
>
> As for time the meetings take, I actually think we can get through the
> agenda quicker in some cases.
>
> So for today lets go with it, and we can post the link to the logs to the
> mailing list as well.
>
> -Jay
>
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, June 22, 2013, Corinne Krych wrote:
>
>> Let's try it!
>>
>
> yeah!! \o/
>
>
>
>
>> On Jun 22, 2013 10:35 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> any result here?
>>>
>>> Should we try the open IRC meeting style?
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, June 18, 2013, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 08:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>> > perhaps a better "meeting minutes" solution would make it more open ?
>>>>> Honestly I don't think we have a better option than IRC meetings -
>>>>> Doing the meetings on video is kinda like the same as if we sat
>>>>> together
>>>>> inside a room and used whiteboards for all the discussion, then just
>>>>> posted pictures of the boards.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know it's more work doing it on a written form, but I think it'll pay
>>>>> off in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Let's try...
>>>> also, when folks are "gone" (e.g. vacation what not), this is more
>>>> transparent and easy to read-up on "meetings".
>>>> right now: almost zero chance of knowing what's going on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> qmx
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130624/55fc962f/attachment-0001.html