[aerogear-dev] Maintenance branches

Kris Borchers kris at redhat.com
Tue Mar 26 11:34:50 EDT 2013


OK. I guess having in progress versions not match is ok.

On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> exactly, you won't use SNAPSHOT, maven forces you to do so, and has a dedicated repo for intermediate "on the go" release"
> 
> On 26/03/2013, at 12:31, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think it does apply. I need a version to put in my package.json on master to indicate it's the next version in progress.
>> 
>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 26/03/2013, at 12:21, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> -SNAPSHOT makes my skin crawl. Can we use the more semver way of -pre?
>>> 
>>> er, this is maven, ignore it - doesn't apply to JS, nor iOS
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> qmx
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> -- 
> qmx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list