[aerogear-dev] Web Push.... (was: Re: AeroGear Native Push Server (DRAFT 0.0.2))

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> the REST API would be like:
>
> https://gist.github.com/matzew/2da6fc349a4aaf629bce#mobile-web-applications


Of course ... something like

     {"channels":["com.news.feed","notifications"]}


would be a bit too generic.....

I think.... order to have these channel really for one web app (and
it's connected clients), these channel names need to be prefixed with
a uniqure ID...



I have updated the gist.....

https://gist.github.com/matzew/2da6fc349a4aaf629bce#unique-channels-per-web-app



>
>
> I think... that we should require at least one channel....
>
> With a _LATER_ update (PUT) we can always add new channels;
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> oh, yeah... :)
>>
>> there are 'subscription' channels for those 'online' clients -
>>
>> a (mobile) web app can have n channels to receive different messages
>>
>> A REST Api to regsiter channels for a (mobile) web app (with the
>> server) will follow
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for web based notifications, I thought about this interface:
>>> https://github.com/matzew/ag-up-poc/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/push/api/WebApplication.java
>>>
>>> 1)
>>> The interface extends this
>>> (https://github.com/matzew/ag-up-poc/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/push/api/MobileApplication.java)
>>> 2)
>>> in here the "instances" are (on native) all installed applications - I
>>> think for WebApp that "instances" should be all "online / connected"
>>> clients
>>>
>>>
>>> Also.... the notifications are really more like 'you have mail'...
>>>
>>> While systems like SockJS/WebSocket (and others) can send/receive
>>> large messages - the notification is really a notify...
>>> (current mindset)
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26/03/2013, at 12:13, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Right now, this is /NOT/ a spec - nor a guide.... Perhaps I keep it this way, for now ??
>>>>
>>>> ?YES!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> qmx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf