[aerogear-dev] Give them a good home

[Douglas Campos]

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:14:33PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
> In our team meeting today, I brought up the question of whether or not the JavaScript clients for both SimplePush and Unified Push should live in folders under AeroGear.js or in their own repos. I would like to open this up to suggestions from the team. Please vote below.
> 
> SimplePush Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push
> IMO, this makes sense since it also has a hard dependency on Notifier
> which lives here
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier I
> would vote this remain where it is. Please vote whether or not this
> should remain in the AeroGear.js repo.
keep as is
> 
> 
> Unified Push Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push
> IMO, this is not necessary since it could be used independently from
> the rest of AeroGear. I would vote that this move to a separate repo.
> This would also mean that the client object's name would change since
> it is currently namespaced under AeroGear as
> AeroGear.UnifiedPushClient. I would suggest it be renamed to
> AGUnifiedPushClient and be added to a repo named
> aerogear/unified-push-js. Please vote for whether or not this should
> move and if it should, an object name and repo name.
Why can't we keep it namespaced?
+1 to split
-1 to changing the namespace.

-- 
qmx