[aerogear-dev] AeroGear Push Message Format

Corinne Krych corinnekrych at gmail.com
Mon May 27 18:00:59 EDT 2013


When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile
variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates)
and device type?
Both aimed at defining categories.
Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be extended?
Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and
alias=john at gmail?


On 27 May 2013 23:36, Kris Borchers <kborcher at redhat.com> wrote:

> Unifying the APIs shouldn't be hard and could probably happen sooner
> rather than later, IMO. As far as the client goes, if you send extra info
> beyond the version it will just be ignored. Though, it would be better to
> not send the extra info to keep payload small. I guess the issue would be
> on the SPS side and if it can handle receiving and ignoring the extra info.
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 14:06, Daniel Passos <daniel at passos.me> wrote:
>
> > Very nice!
> > +1 to discuss later how to "unify" APIs
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> We /could/ (later?) try to unify the API and simply
> >> *IGNORE* everything besides the version, when talking
> >> to|SimplePush| Variant.
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130528/da841b9b/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list