[aerogear-dev] What is our default JDK platform?

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Wed May 29 09:40:17 EDT 2013


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Only for Android as Summers already mentioned.
>

yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :)



>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7....
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com
> > <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and compiler
> >     plugin is set
> >     to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6.
> >
> >     Karel
> >
> >
> >       On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200
> >     Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >      > Hi,
> >      >
> >      > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x
> >     (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT)
> >      > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that
> >     has this
> >      > requirement.
> >      >
> >      > cheers,
> >      >
> >      > /Dan
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com
> >     <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      > > Hi,
> >      > >
> >      > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6.
> >     Android
> >      > > requires
> >      > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The
> >     only component
> >      > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict.
> >      > >
> >      > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one),
> >     I'd prefer
> >      > > to
> >      > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense?
> >      > >
> >      > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API
> >     conformance and
> >      > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common
> >     parent with
> >      > > plugin
> >      > > configuration?
> >      > >
> >      > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend
> >     JDK7 or
> >      > > JDK6?
> >      > > I'm biased here to decide myself.
> >      > >
> >      > > Thanks,
> >      > >
> >      > > Karel
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > > _______________________________________________
> >      > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> >      > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >      > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >      > >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     aerogear-dev mailing list
> >     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130529/312b2ebb/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list