[aerogear-dev] What is our default JDK platform?

Matthias Wessendorf matzew at apache.org
Wed May 29 10:07:50 EDT 2013


+1


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Security has dependency with other projects, so just in case I'm testing
> it against both
>
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security-picketlink/blob/master/.travis.yml#L3
>
> Also OTP must support Android and the backend, testing both for the same
> reason.
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org
> > <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     Only for Android as Summers already mentioned.
> >
> >
> > yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :)
> >
> >
> >     Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >      > Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7....
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com
> >     <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>
> >      > <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      >     Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and
> >     compiler
> >      >     plugin is set
> >      >     to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6.
> >      >
> >      >     Karel
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >       On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200
> >      >     Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>
> >      > <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      > > Hi,
> >      > >
> >      > > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x
> >      >     (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT)
> >      > > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that
> >      >     has this
> >      > > requirement.
> >      > >
> >      > > cheers,
> >      > >
> >      > > /Dan
> >      > >
> >      > >
> >      > > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com
> >     <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>
> >      > <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com <mailto:kpiwko at redhat.com>>> wrote:
> >      > >
> >      > > > Hi,
> >      > > >
> >      > > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6.
> >      >     Android
> >      > > > requires
> >      > > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The
> >      >     only component
> >      > > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict.
> >      > > >
> >      > > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one),
> >      >     I'd prefer
> >      > > > to
> >      > > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense?
> >      > > >
> >      > > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API
> >      >     conformance and
> >      > > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common
> >      >     parent with
> >      > > > plugin
> >      > > > configuration?
> >      > > >
> >      > > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys
> recommend
> >      >     JDK7 or
> >      > > > JDK6?
> >      > > > I'm biased here to decide myself.
> >      > > >
> >      > > > Thanks,
> >      > > >
> >      > > > Karel
> >      > > >
> >      > > >
> >      > > > _______________________________________________
> >      > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> >      > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >     <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >     <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >      > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >      > > >
> >      >
> >      >     _______________________________________________
> >      >     aerogear-dev mailing list
> >      > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >     <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >     <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >      > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > --
> >      > Matthias Wessendorf
> >      >
> >      > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >      > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >      > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >      >
> >      > _______________________________________________
> >      > aerogear-dev mailing list
> >      > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >
> >      > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     aerogear-dev mailing list
> >     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130529/4ab34592/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list