[aerogear-dev] Imporovements to Push Server draft (Was: Some questions about the Unified Push Server...)

[Matthias Wessendorf]

SimplePush: platform & network :-)



On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote:

>  On 29/05/2013 18:23, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> Almost :)
>
>  Hybrid would not use SimplePush :) It would use GCM (Cordova on Android)
> or APNs (Cordova on iOS).
>
>  2)
> "Adds iOS, Android or SimplePush variant", ok ?
>
>  4) Let's use the SimplePush (not Simple Push)
>
>
> Yes, my bad on the typo.
>
> Should we mention the name of the Push Network name there though?
> "iOS" and "Android" are platform names, but SimplePush is a Push Network
> name.
> This is why I went with "(Hybrid) Web" to keep things consistent.
>
> Hylke
>
>
>  Mozilla writes it that way as well:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/SimplePush
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  Here's the updated graphic:
> https://github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/blob/master/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
>
> Hylke
>
>
>
>
> On 29/05/2013 16:57, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  On 29/05/2013 16:42, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>  wow - I like the graphic. A few more "corrections"
>
>  1) Developers can also add "SimplePush variant"
>  2) How about "Mobile application (aka MobileVariantInstance), running on
> the device, register themselves using a token" ?
>
>  Sure, I'll fix that.
>
>
>  cool
>
>
>
>    3) I think JBoss AS backend server makes sense here - however, it can
> be bloody PHP app as well :)
>
>  True, I think this is a minor
>
>

-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130530/a191f67d/attachment.html