[aerogear-dev] blog links

Erik Jan de Wit edewit at redhat.com
Tue Oct 15 02:20:15 EDT 2013


Created an issue AEROGEAR-1334 and will look into arquillian site to see how they are doing this. Pull request coming

Cheers,
	Erik Jan

On 14 Oct,2013, at 15:56 , Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:51 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> So my suggestion was not to have something like planet.jboss.org where we have duplicate posts, but to have an aggregator to get blog posts from our personal blogs that contain a special tag, 'aerogear' for instance, and have jekyll download that rss.xml file then we can have a page somewhere on the aerogear.org site, that is the same style as the rest of the site, with just links and maybe a short intro to the actual blog. That way people searching for things about aerogear don't have to know all our personal names and blog addresses and it doesn't kill SEO it supports it as our blogs will even ranked higher in google. The only issue with this approach is that we don't update the site that often, but that is also something we could live with.
> 
> This was my thinking as well but also perhaps looking into a way to use JS to update the article list from the feed instead of needing a full re-deply for updates.  I believe Awestruct has some similar features for blogs and tweets.  
> 
> Imo at least something to look into.  Erik - could you update the jira with some of this info and/or link to the thread so we can capture these ideas?
> 
>> 
>> On 11 Oct,2013, at 17:37 , Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:52:52PM +0200, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Am 11.10.2013 um 16:49 schrieb Jay Balunas:
>>>>>> Duplicated content hurts SEO, that's why I've been avoiding it...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you know the degree of impact here, or links for more details for
>>>>> us to review.  I did some quick searches and read some of them, but
>>>>> a lot seemed mixed, some good, some bad.  
>>>> 
>>>> SEO is one part of the game. The other is the visibility on jboss.org
>>>> and also the feeds from it that people may have already subscribed to.
>>> 
>>> AFAIK, our blogs are on planet.jboss.org (at least my posts tagged with
>>> 'aerogear' appear there :P)
>>> 
>>> Either way, our site is pretty different from jboss.org (ours is 100%
>>> static html), and I don't think it'll be healthy to pull this feeds on
>>> the client side. And this feels a little bit old too - hence why I'm
>>> trying to avoid the 'aggregator'.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list