[aerogear-dev] [Unified Push Server] Roles structure & password management

[Lucas Holmquist]

On Oct 15, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:

> So for the next Unified Push Release (0.9) it would be nice if we could have some decent User Management, so I'm bumping this thread again. 
> Some existing pointer :
> 
> -   this thread :)
> -  https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-351 
> -  https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 
> 
> First point to define is : 
> -  What roles do we want ? And what can these Roles do ?

Admin - Can do all things including creating other users
Developer - can create apps and such. no access to the user management UI
User - read only - not sure if this one is needed

> -  How can these Roles be created (granted ...)
> -  Design 

I think we are still waiting on Hylke for this?   not sure

> 
> Seb
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Apostolos Emmanouilidis <aemmanou at redhat.com> wrote:
> Following the discussion on GitHub [1], here are some points to be
> discussed about the user management flow:
> 
> - Does it make sense to add a role select field (admin, developer) on
> the enrollment page?
> 
> hrm, and (perhaps later) a section where to define the roles ? I think it's a good point, but not sure we need all this 'now' :-)
>  
> - Should we add an additional password field (password confirmation) on
> the enrollment page?
> 
> yeah, would be nice
>  
> - I think that the current logged in user shouldn't be available for
> deletion
> 
> yep, I agree 
> 
> [1]:
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server-admin-ui/pull/6
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:15 +0200, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> > A Jira has been created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-351
> > And draft structure has been created
> > here https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 that can be used
> > as base for the Pull Request.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> >         On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:39:28AM -0300, Bruno Oliveira
> >         wrote:
> >         > Would be nice to have a 8 hands document on it
> >
> >
> >         who's going to start the pull request on it? it's SPECTIME!
> >
> >         --
> >         qmx
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         aerogear-dev mailing list
> >         aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20131017/b6cc9f7b/attachment-0001.html