[aerogear-dev] [Unified Push Server] Roles structure & password management

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Wed Sep 4 11:31:45 EDT 2013


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:

> Currently i think "Apps" are associated with a specific user,  so if we
> introduce new users, then those new users won't be able to see any of the
> existing apps,  even if they have the same roles.
>

That's a interesting point : I assume the relation between user and apps is
now 1-1 but do we want n-1 (multiple users could manage an app) in the
future ? so after creating a user we could affect him to an app.


>
> this should probably change to be more role based,  example:
>
> Admin role:
>         All CRUD on Apps and CRUD user management
> Developer:
>         CRUD on Apps
> User:
>         just READ Apps
>
>
>
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Start point is this jira https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-282 for
> >> allowing the creation of additional users/developers.
> >> In the current situation we have just one role : "developer" , so the
> >> first question is :
> >>
> >> - Should a user with the role "developer" be able to create another
> user ?
> >
> > It depends, I think is a matter of rules inside AGPUSH. Maybe we should
> > have a role hierarchy definition? Would be nice.
> >
> >> - Should we introduce a "admin" role that can manage users (create,
> >> reset password, delete) ?
> >
> > Makes sense.
> >
> >> - A mix of permissions ? (a developer can create other users but not
> >> remove them nor reset (except its own) password )
> >
> > The hierarchy should be clear users/roles and levels, we can start a
> > simple gist on it.
> >>
> >> From there the second question regarding password management :
> >> In the current situation, our default user (called "admin" , yeah a bit
> >> confusing :) ) has a temporary password that must be changed the first
> >> time he logs in.
> >>
> >> - Do we want to keep this ?
> >
> > That is a old request from my side and violates CWE-798
> > (http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html)
> >>
> >> - Shall we move to a script that creates a user(s) ?
> >
> > +1 for provide a script like "sample-db.sql" or whatever out of the box.
> +1
> >>
> >> - When we add a user through the admin UI, should we provide a password
> >> or should it be generated and changed on first login ?
> >
> > In theory we should send the password reset instructions with the url to
> > change it like:
> >
> > http://admin-ui.org/changeme/424242424242424 (Using the SecureRandom
> > entropy from Java)
> >
> >>
> >> In other words, I think we must concretely spec out the user management
> >> for the UPS and we could use this thread to discuss that !
> >
> > +1 I'm all for it
> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > --
> > abstractj
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130904/e5665e34/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list